Writers need reviews; they need feedback from readers, they
want word about their books to spread and what better way than by word of mouth
via a review?
But of course writers are readers too. Reading feeds
creativity and so does reviewing. There’s something about thinking in depth
about a good book that can spark ideas almost from nowhere. Many of the best reviewers
are also successful and prolific writers. Indeed, writers more than most should
be conscientious about reviewing what they read.
As a writer I know that all too well. Do I live by it? I’d
love to say an unequivocal yes, but I can’t. One reason is time. If I’m going
to review a book, I want to write something about it, not just tick a random
number of stars*. I tend to ‘stack’ my reviews, save them up until I get into a
proper review mood and then catch up the backlog. It doesn’t always work.
Sometimes I leave it just a bit too long and as I sit down to put pen to paper I
realise that I don’t remember enough about the book to say anything coherent,
so it has to return to my read-again pile and hope that I’ll catch it next time
round.
I’m just in the middle of a bit of a review frenzy at
present. Not expecting to clear the entire backlog, but HERE is a recent one.
*more on the tiresome star system in a later post.
Awesome article, it was exceptionally helpful! I simply began in this and I'm becoming more acquainted with it better! Cheers, keep doing awesome! us essay writer
ReplyDelete